Who are Adjusters International

Insurance :: Who are Adjusters International ::

Introduction

A magnitude 6.8 earthquake, called Nisqually in seismic circles, rocked Seattle, Washington, in 2001 and severely damaged the Starbucks corporate headquarters building.

Case Description

The 1,850,000-square-foot facility is a vintage 1910–1926 building, constructed by poured-in-place concrete with URM (unreinforced masonry) filler walls, which are known, in this day and age, to be prone to failure when faced with an earthquake or high wind pressure. Fortunately, about a year before the earthquake, the building had been seismically retrofitted.

Adjusters International was hired by the building owners, Nitze-Stagen & Co., Inc., to address, among the many issues, the position taken by the insurance carriers that the building was old and the damage pre-existed the magnitude 6.8 earthquake.

List of Issues

The insurance carriers’ consultants took the position that most of the cracks had occurred before the earthquake.
The insurance carriers’ consultants prepared a repair proposal that was based upon the installation of Heli pins into the URM in-filled walls.
The carriers argued that although the slabs were cracked as a result of the earthquake, the cracks did not affect the performance of the slabs.
The carriers refused to pay out for the projected cost of repairs before the repairs were effectuated.

Solutions Applied

Adjusters International assembled a team of engineers to prepare a dynamic analysis and presentation that cited petrographic analyses demonstrating that Nisqually had indeed caused the cracks.

Adjusters International’s team of engineers proved that the carriers’ proposal to use Heli pins to repair damaged walls would result in additional and more severe damage to the URM walls in the event of another magnitude 6.8 earthquake. Such a repair, Adjusters International’s experts additionally pointed out, was not in compliance with FEMA guidelines.

Our team researched the legality of the insurance carriers’ position that coverage applied only to actual repairs, and Adjusters International was able to prove that the carriers’ position would not stand up and would be impossible to defend in a court of law. Ultimately, the insurers agreed.

Outcome

Adjusters International’s team of professionals created a body of legal and technical evidence that clearly demonstrated the effects of the large earthquake on the building. The evidence also shed light onto the scope of damage another earthquake could cause if the course of repairs was not properly directed. With the help of Adjusters International, the building owners were able to make repairs in the manner they felt would best protect their assets for the future.

Case 2:

Fire Damages Vermont Ski Resort

Introduction

The Mountain Green Ski & Golf Resort in Killington, Vermont, suffered a devastating fire loss at the end of ski season. The fire began in an underground parking garage, burning so hot that it melted a portion of the structural steel supporting the seven–story condo resort.

Case Description

As a result of the high–intensity fire, the first floor collapsed two feet and the threat of a total collapse loomed. Damage was in the millions of dollars, and business for the following ski season was threatened if the property could not be repaired in time.

List of Issues

Could Mountain Green repair the partially collapsed building and be back in business for the next season, or was demolition the only option?
How would Mountain Green handle the interests of the 116 condo owners?
What cleanup and mitigation efforts were covered in the policy?
The elevator system was damaged, but according to the insurance carrier, replacing the elevators was not covered by the policy.
The insurance carrier attempted to classify major damage to the property as pre–existing.

Solutions Applied

Determined to save the building from demolition, Adjusters International located an engineering firm specializing in structural repair to lift and suspend the building, repair the structural steel and the ground floor, and then reattach the building to the foundation. This approach saved money and time–critical for the resort´s reopening.

Adjusters International set up a hotline for the individual condo owners, and also handled the associations involvement in each owner claim. This streamlined the tenants´ claims processes with their various insurance carriers.

The insurance company was reluctant to pay to clean metal surfaces. Adjusters International argued that, without the cleaning, the stage would be set for the insurance company to later deny coverage for the rusting metal surfaces using the logic that damage was not mitigated as required.

State officials agreed with Adjusters Internationals experts that the elevators would not be safe if repaired. Since the state would not certify the repairs, the insurance company stated this was a codes and ordinance upgrade issue, and thus, not covered by the insurance policy. Adjusters International argued that since no upgraded standard was required, it was not a codes mandate.

Adjusters International proved that cracked tiles throughout the resort were not pre–existing. Since smoke covered all surfaces, and many cracks in the tile were clean and white, and not covered with soot, the cracks had to have occurred at the time of collapse.

Outcome

In a classic case of point/counter-point, Adjusters International executed a well-coordinated plan to resolve disparities throughout the insurance claim process. The resort was successfully re-opened–just nine months later–in time for the next ski season.

legal disclaimer

Our website is not responsible for the information contained by this article. Web-articles is a free articles resource.
Suggestion: If you need fresh, daily updated content for your website, feel free to use our service. Click here for more information.

1. How am I protected if my bank mortgage lender or investment company out of business
WHAT HAPPENS IF YOUR BANK, MORTGAGE LENDER, BROKER, OR INSURANCE COMPANY GOES OUT OF BUSINESS? There have been a lot of financial institution failures lately, but fortunately, you generally are protected. However, your protection varies based on the type and size of account you have. Bank Failure Some of your best protection comes if you invest with a bank or savings institution that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or a credit union that is insured by the National Credit Un...

2. What to do if I lost my job
Tackling Special Situations IF YOU LOSE YOUR JOB I lost my job yesterday after 11 years at the company. I was tempted not to tell my family last night, but I did. I just don’t know how we’re going to make it financially. Losing your job is traumatic under any circumstances, but particularly when unemployment is high and job prospects seem bleak. Vast numbers of American workers are being laid off, at the rate of over 50,000 per week in late 2008, with most economists predicting that the numbe...

3. Budget for early retirement solutions
EVALUATING EARLY-RETIREMENT INCENTIVE PLANS My company has offered an early-retirement incen tive plan to everyone in my department. I wasn’t planning to retire for a few more years, but the offer seems attractive. I like my job, but I might get laid off anyway if things get worse. I don’t know what to do. Early-retirement incentive programs are a common means of achieving a reduction in the workforce, and for com panies in the midst of a slowing business climate, downsizing, mergers, or takeovers,...

4. Health insurance coverage and Medicare
At the end of 2006, the resident population of the United States was approximately 300 million. Roughly 250 million people had some form of health health insurance. The operative word is roughly. People obtain health insurance from a variety of sources. Many of them have access to and sometimes coverage from more than one source. Moreover, they may not have coverage for the entire year, and there is no single repository of data on who has what sort of coverage over what period of time. Thus, a person livi...

5. Medicare Medicaid and Medigap insurance plans
Medicare Medicare generally provides health insurance coverage to those over age 65. The Medicare Trustees reported that Medicare covered 42.5 million individuals in 2005, 35.8 million of whom were over age 65. The elderly Medicare program has four "parts." Part A essentially covers hospital, skilled nursing facility, and home health services, which are paid for by the payroll taxes earmarked for the Medicare program. Part B essentially covers physici...

6. The demand for health insureance
THE DEMAND FOR HEALTH INSURANCE Life is a gamble. Suppose we were to flip a coin. If it comes up "heads," you lead a healthy, normal life. If it comes up "tails," you become seriously ill. Medical science can return you to the healthy state, but medical science is not cheap. Treatment will cost you $20,000, plus some associated pain and suffering. Are you willing to buy a health insurance policy to attenuate the financial consequences of your potential bad luck? The correct response is "maybe." It depends on the p...

7. Employer Sponsored Health Insurance is less costly
Taxes and Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Analysis of the demand for health insurance is complicated by the fact that most people in the United States get their health insurance through their workplace. The reason for this is twofold. Workers value health insurance, and it is less costly when purchased through an employer. Both points are important. Workers do value health insurance. A 1991 Gallup poll indicated that health insurance was the single most valued employment fringe benefit for...

8. HMO Effect mentains your health
"HMO Effect" vs. Favorable Selection Much of the empirical research on adverse selection in healthcare was done in the 1980s, as employers began to offer HMOs and other managed care plans. The issue arose because of substantial differences in the utilization experience of those enrolled in HMOs and those in conventional health insurance plans. Robert Miller and Hal Luft [1994] reviewed much of the literature on the differences in utilization, and Box 4-2 presents a summary of their findings. Essentially, Miller and Luft...

9. Adverse and favorable selection in Medicare program
Favorable Selection in the Medicare Program Adverse and favorable selection are not just concerns of private insurers; they are also significant issues for the federal Medicare program for the elderly. Since the 1970s, the Medicare program has allowed beneficiaries to be in traditional Medicare or to join a Medicare HMO. Until 2006, the program allowed Medicare beneficiaries to transfer to or from traditional Medicare each month. As with most HMOs, Medicare HMOs provide a limited panel of physicians...