The World Bank lists 132 countries. Different countries represent varying market
potential due to economic, cultural, and political contrasts. These contrasts mean
that a global marketer cannot select target customers randomly but must employ
workable criteria to choose countries where the company’s product/service has
the best opportunity for success.
Major Markets
The most basic information needed to identify markets concerns population
because people, of course, constitute a market. The population of the world
reached an estimated6.0 billion in 1998. According to the latest estimates from the
United Nations, this total is expected to increase to6.2 billion by the year 2000 and
to almost8.5 billion by 2025. Current world population is growing at about1.7
percent per year. This is a slight decline from the peak rate of1.9 percent, but the
absolute number of people being added to the world’s population each year is
still increasing. This figure is expected to peak at the turn of the century at about
90 million additional people per year.
Population growth rates vary significantly by region. Europe has the lowest
rate of population growth at only about 0.3 percent per year. Several European
countries, including Austria, Denmark, West Germany, Luxembourg and
Sweden, are experiencing declining populations. Growth rates are also below 1
percent per year in North America.
The regions with the highest population growth rates are Africa (3 percent
per year), Latin America (2 percent per year), and South Asia (1.9 percent per
year). China, the world’s most populous country, is growing at only about1.2 percent
per year. Even so, it means that China’s population increases by over 12 million
people each year. The world’s second most populous country, India, is
growing at over1.7 percent per year. India’s population is expected to grow from
970 million today to 1 billion by about 2003.
One striking aspect of population growth in developing countries is the rapid
rate of urbanization. The urban population is growing at less than 1 percent in
Europe and in North America, but it is growing at almost3.5 percent in the developing
world. Today 15 of the 20 largest urban agglomerations are in the developing
world. By the year 2000, 17 of the 20 will be in the developing world. The only
cities in the top 20 located in developed countries will be Tokyo, New York, and
Los Angeles.
The world’s largest cities will be Mexico City (27 million) and Sao
Paulo (25 million).
The above information shows that the total market in Europe and North
America will not be increasing; the population of these two continents will not
add much to total market size. Of course, these populations are growing older, so
certain segments will increase in number. For example, the total population of
Europe will increase only2.8 percent from 1990 to 2000, but the over-65 population
in Europe will increase by 14 percent during the same period.
In the developing world, the increase in numbers does not necessarily mean
increased markets for U.S. business. The fastest-growing region in the world,
Africa, is also experiencing low or negative rates of economic growth per capita.
Many Latin American countries, Brazil in particular, are hampered by huge external
debts that force them to try to limit imports while using their resources to generate
foreign exchange for debt service. In most of these cases, the problem of
foreign debt will need to be solved before the growing populations in the developing
world will translate into large markets for U.S. business.
Obviously, population figures alone provide little information about market
potential because people must have the means in terms of income to become viable customers. Two conclusions are obvious, however: (a) aggregate consuming
capacity depends upon total population as well as per capital income; and (b)
advanced countries dominate as potential customers.
Although population and income variables provide a snapshot of the market
opportunity in a given country, a variety of other factors must be considered to
identify viable markets. These factors are urbanization, consumption patterns,
infrastructure, and overall industrialization. Taking these factors into account,
Business International has identified twelve countries as major global markets. Interestingly, three of these twelve countries China, Brazil, and
India are developing countries.
Although these twelve countries have been identified as the principal global
markets by Business International, they may not all be viable markets from the viewpoint
of U.S. firms. A variety of environmental factors (political, legal, cultural) affect market opportunity in a nation. For example, Brazil is burdened with debt,
which limits the amount of export potential in that country; China’s political control
limits freedom of choice; India’s regulations make it difficult for foreign corporations
to conduct business there. Thus, many countries may not have large market
potential, yet they may constitute important markets for U.S. business.
Also shown is the dollar
amount of exports to each country in 1997. It should be noted that, globally speaking,
although Canada ranks as the 12th largest market in the world it represents the single largest market for the United States, accounting for
over one-fifth of its trade.
Emerging Markets
Traditionally, a major proportion of international business activities of U.S. corporations
has been limited to developed countries. For example, at the end of
1997, total U.S. direct investment was estimated to be $794 billion, of which almost 70 percent was in developed countries. Slowly, however, new markets are
unfolding. Consider the newly industrializing countries. During the decade of the
1980s, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong were the world’s fastestgrowing
economies and consequently offered new opportunities for U.S. firms.
In recent years, even developing countries, at least the more politically stable
ones, have begun to show viable market potential. Anumber of developing countries
are achieving higher and higher growth rates every year. Although an individual
country may not provide adequate potential for U.S. corporations,
developing countries as a group constitute a major market. In 1998, almost 30 percent
of U.S. trade was with developing countries. In future years, the flow of U.S.
trade with developing countries should increase. An Organization of Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) study showed that, in 1970, OECD countries,
with just 20 percent of the world’s people, had 83 percent of the world’s
trade in manufactures; whereas developing countries, with 70 percent of the
world’s people, captured just 11 percent of the trade. In the year 2000, however, it
is estimated that OECD countries, with 15 percent of the population, will have 63
percent of the world’s trade in manufactures; developing countries, with 78 percent
of the population, will account for 28 percent of world trade. Interestingly,
although for cultural, political, and economic reasons, Western Europe, Canada,
and to a lesser extent Japan have always been predominantly important for business,
many developing countries provide a better return on U.S. investment. The relevance of emerging markets for the United States can be illustrated
with reference to Pacific basin countries.
Over the last quarter century, streams of
food, fuels, textiles, cameras, cars, and videocassette recorders flowing from
countries all across Asia exerted heavy pressure on Western economies. This outpouring
of exports has increased the Asian/Pacific share of world trade from less
than 10 percent in the 1970s to over 25 percent in 1997 and has pushed one Asian
economy after another out of the Dark Ages and into the global marketplace.
For U.S. marketers, rising Pacific power holds both a threat and a promise. The
threat is dramatically increased competition for sales and market share, both at
home and abroad. In 1997 alone, Asian/Pacific countries supplied 40 percent of all
U.S. merchandise imports and contributed some $68 billion to the U.S. trade
deficit, 70 percent of the total. As for the promise, there is the emergence of a market
of more than two billion potential consumers. In the last 25 years, as the Pacific
region began its time-bending leap into the twentieth century, millions of Asians
began an equally rapid transition from rural to urban, from agrarian to industrial,
and from feudal to contemporary society. With more of the Pacific region’s rural
population traveling to cities to shop every day, the demand for goods and services
from the most basic household commodities to sophisticated technical
devices is soaring. Despite the recent currency problems, in the coming years, as
rising incomes continue to bolster the spending power of Asia’s new consumer
population, the opportunities for shrewd marketers will be unparalleled.
Barriers to conducting business in the region are beginning to fall, too.
Increasingly, throughout the region English is the language of commerce, and an
allegiance to free market economics is widespread. And, as companies such as McDonald’s, General Foods, Unilever, and Coca-Cola have already discovered,
from Penang to Taipei, this is a region where well-made and well-marketed products
and services are witnessing increasing acceptance.
As modern influences exert greater pressure on traditional Asian cultures,
two trends with important implications for marketers are starting to take shape:
• Although each Asian nation is culturally distinct, consumers throughout the
Pacific region are gradually sharing more of the same wants and needs. As Asian
homogenization progresses, sophisticated strategies and considerable economies
of scale in regional and global marketing and advertising will become increasingly
relevant.
• Many Western marketers misinterpret the nature of current changes in the Pacific
region. Despite the Big Macs, the Levi’s, the Nikes, and all the other familiar trappings,
Asia is not Westernizing it’s modernizing. Asian consumers are buying
Western goods and services, not Western values and cultures.
Elsewhere in the East, India and China are two large markets that should provide
unprecedented opportunities for U.S. corporations as we enter the next century,
and as their economies become fully market oriented. A growing number of
U.S. consumer-goods companies have begun to make inroads in China. In
November 1987, Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. opened the first Western fastfood
restaurant in China. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are aggressively expanding distribution.
Kodak and other foreign film suppliers have attained a 70 percent share
of the color film market. Nescafé and Maxwell House are waging coffee combat
in a land of tea.
A number of U.S. companies PepsiCo, Timex, General Foods, Kellogg
have entered India to serve its emerging middle class. Thus, the developing
countries provide new opportunities for U.S. corporations to expand business
overseas: as their wealth grows, U.S. marketing possibilities expand.
It has been observed that early in the next century Latin American countries,
too, will emerge as modern, Northern-styled marketplaces with improved transportation
systems, subsidized credit to native businesses, and marketing education
programs. All of these changes should result in more efficient channels of
distribution, more local marketing support services, and fewer bottlenecks that
hamper exchanges.
All of these indications point toward a variety of emerging
opportunities for U.S. corporations in Latin America.
For example, a few years ago, the Gillette Co., discovered that only eight percent
of Mexican men who shave used shaving cream. Sensing an opportunity,
Gillette introduced plastic tubes of shaving cream in Guadalajara, Mexico, that
sold for half the price of its aerosol. In a year’s time, 13 percent of Guadalajaran
men began to use shaving cream. Gillette has been selling its new product,
Prestobarba (Spanish for “quick shave”), in the rest of Mexico, in Colombia, and
in Brazil.
These emerging markets in less-developed countries can help many U.S. corporations
to counter the results of demographic changes in Western nations
examined above. As mentioned above, in most advanced nations of the world, birthrates are declining while population in the developing countries is growing.
This increasing population holds the future growth potential for U.S. business.
With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the lifting of the Iron Curtain, new opportunities
await Western managers in Eastern Europe, previously a forbidden
region. In many ways, the opening of Eastern Europe could prove even more
important than the drive for a single market in Western Europe. Take, for example,
Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia. Their combined GNP is larger than
that of China. These three countries also have relatively well-trained and reliable
workers who work for less than a quarter of what Western Europeans are paid.
Giving them access to their developed neighbors’ markets and hefty injections of
Western capital, they could become the tigers of Europe. As their economies grow,
they should develop into viable markets for a variety of goods and services.
Developments in Eastern Europe will benefit American companies in two
ways. First, as Eastern Europe’s backward economies finally integrate into the
global economy and take off, new market opportunities should emerge. Second,
sales to Western Europe by U.S. firms, made even more dynamic by its expanding
Eastern frontier, will increase. Just as markets in the 1980s were developed by
Reaganomics and Thatcherism, markets in the next century will be developed by
the shifting of the ideological plates that have separated the world’s geopolitical
land masses. Companies that aim for global market and remain competitive will
be the winners.
The Triad Market
From a global perspective, the United States, Canada, Japan, and Western Europe,
often referred to as triad countries, constitute the major market. Although elsewhere
opportunities are emerging, in the foreseeable future these countries continue
to be the leading markets. They account for approximately 14 percent of the
world’s population, but they represent over 70 percent of world gross product. As
such, these countries absorb a major proportion of capital and consumer products
and, thus, are the most advanced consuming societies in the world. Not only do
most product innovations take place in these countries, but they also serve as the
opinion leaders and mold the purchasing and consumption behavior of the
remaining 86 percent of the world’s population.
For example, over 90 percent of the world’s computers are used by triad
countries. In the case of numerically controlled machine tools, almost 100 percent
are distributed in the triad market. The same pattern follows in consumer products.
The triad accounts for 90 percent of the demand for electronic consumer
goods. What these statistics point to is that a company that ignores the market
potential of the triad does so at its own peril.
An interesting characteristic of the triad market is the universalization of
needs. For example, not too long ago manufacturers of capital equipment produced
machinery that reflected strong cultural distinctions. West German
machines reflected that nation’s penchant for craftsmanship; American equipment
was often extravagant in its use of raw materials. But these distinctions have
disappeared. The best-selling factory machines have lost the “art” element that
once distinguished them and have become both in appearance and in the level of skill that they require much more similar. The current revolution in production
engineering has brought about ever-increasing global standards of performance.
In an era when productivity improvements can quickly determine life or death on
a global scale, companies cannot afford to indulge in a metallic piece of art that
will last 30 years.
At the same time, consumer markets have become fairly homogeneous.
Ohmae notes that
Triad consumption patterns, which is both a cause and an effect of cultural patterns,
has its roots to a large extent in the educational system.
As educational systems enable
more people to use technology, they tend to become more similar to each other. It
follows, therefore, that education leading to higher levels of technological achievement
also tends to eradicate differences in lifestyles. Penetration of television, which
enables everyone possessing a television set to share sophisticated behavioral information
instantaneously throughout the world, has also accelerated this trend. There
are, for example, 750 million consumers in all three parts of the Triad (Japan, the
United States and Canada, the nations of Western Europe) with strikingly similar
needs and preferences. . . . A new generation worships the universal “now” gods
ABBA, Levi’s and Arpege. . . . Youngsters in Denmark, West Germany, Japan, and
California are all growing up with ketchup, jeans, and guitars. Their lifestyles, aspirations,
and desires are so similar that you might call them “OECDites” or Triadians,
rather than by names denoting their national identity.
There are many reasons for the similarities and commonalities in the triad’s
consumer demand and lifestyle patterns. First, the purchasing power of triad residents,
as expressed in discretionary income per individual, is more than 10 times
greater than that of residents of developing countries. For example, television
penetration in triad countries is greater than 94 percent, whereas in newly industrialized
countries it is 25 percent; for the developing countries, it is less than 10
percent. Second, their technological infrastructure is more advanced. For example,
over 70 percent of triadian households have a telephone. This makes it feasible
to use such products as facsimile, teletext, and digital data transmission/
processing equipment. Third, the educational level is much higher in triad
nations than in other parts of the world. Fourth, the number of physicians per
10,000 in triad countries, which creates demand for pharmaceuticals and medical
electronics, exceeds 30. Fifth, better infrastructure in the triad leads to opportunities
not feasible in less-developed markets. For example, paved roads have made
rapid penetration of radial tires and sports cars possible.
|